Friday, November 29, 2019

Genetic Influences on Personality free essay sample

Genetic influences appear to contribute significantly to the differences between people in personality’. Discuss. The research carried out in the field of behavioural genetics has indicated, over the course of many studies, that genetic influence has a direct affect on individual differences in personality. We will write a custom essay sample on Genetic Influences on Personality or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Still, behavioural genetics has a lot to provide to the study of personality than inheritability predicts. This paper will discuss a few of the findings from research carried out on behavioural genetics in personality that go beyond the basic question; nature vs. nurture. The findings from the research include genetic continuity and environmental change during development, the impact of shared and non-shared environmental influences on personality and personality as a go-between of genetic influence on environmental measures. There are two general methods that have commonly been employed by behavioural geneticists investigating the genetic influence on personality: twin studies and adoption studies. Recently, there has been a surplus of behavioural genetic studies in the aetiology, particularly when discussing individual differences in personality. The results conclude that ‘Most personality traits show some genetic influence’; this has now become accepted within the study personality, (Plomin, DeFries, 1996). A very important discovery in genetic research on personality relates to the environment. It has been stated that genetic aspects are responsible for approximately 20 to 50% of the phenotypic variation in personality. The remaining variation is said to be the cause of environmental aspects. On the other hand, the study of twins and adoption find that shared family environments are accountable for only a small portion of variation in a majority of element of personality (Plomin, DeFries, 1996). It is important to note that there are a few aspects of this study that have grown to be quite complex. One of these aspects is the theory and research stating the differences between environmental influences on personality. First of all, a majority of researchers focus on comparing how shared and non-shared environmental aspects influence personality. Eysenck (1991) uggested that siblings or twins who shared environmental influences contribute only slightly to personality differences. Though an interesting point surfaced as a result of studies carried out by Plomin et al (1992); environmental aspects, unique (non-share) to family members, are influential over shared environmental aspects. Family personality is similar primarily due to the DNA which is shared with one another and not because of the shared family environments. This was established in a study of infants personality where a correlation was found for temperament to be about . 0 for genetically unrelated adoptive siblings—which provides a direct test of shared family environment—and . 20 for genetically related non-adoptive siblings (Braungart, Plomin, DeFries, Fulker, 1992). A question can be posed based on these results, if shared family environments do not shape personality, then what does? The answer lies within families and not between families. â€Å"The environmental influences that are important to personality are those aspects that are not shared by members of the same family—that is, environmental influences that are unique to family members† (Pedersen et al. 1992). These environmental influences (non-shared) make family members different from each another (Plomin Daniels, 1987). Non-shared environmental aspects could include differential parental treatment; differential extra familial relationships with friends, peers, and teachers; and non-systematic aspects such as accidents or illness (Plomin, Chipuer, Neiderhiser, 1994). The examination of environmental aspects that differ across families is not as beneficial to this study as the examination on environmental factors that differ within families. However, Reiss (1997) and Harris (1995), suggest that effects within-family pose problems when considering genetic heritability. The effects of children and parents can be under and over estimated; as a result it is vital to look into why each member of a family differ so much when it comes to personality. The solution will involve studying more than a single individual per family and discovering the association of experiential differences within a family with differences in personality. Harris (1995) has stated that non-shared aspects outside the family maybe more important in developing people’s personality. He explained the importance of non-shared environmental aspects by presenting the groups socialisation theory to determine personality. Social Learning Theory and Social Categorisation are the main elements of group socialisation. In social categorisation, similar individuals are placed into their in groups and individuals who are viewed as being different are placed within their out group. Harris utilised this concept to present how social groups can have an influence on people’s personality and how these non-shared environments that occur in children of the same family can have huge effects on personality. It has been possible to obtain encouraging results when associating non-shared environmental aspects to personality. For example, in the Sibling Inventory of Differential Experience (SIDE; Daniels Plomin, 1985), sibilings that had different experiences were linked with the personality differences in adolescence and adulthood (Baker Daniels, 1990; Daniels, 1986). However, it is not entirely correct to assume that shared family environments are unimportant to personality. For example, studies carried out on twins show considerable shared environmental influence for juvenile delinquency (Plomin, Thompson, 1995). Bouchard et al. (2003), in a study called the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, discovered that even when identical twins were bought up separately there was strong evidence showing similarities in personality. Bouchard also discovered that fraternal twins who are raised up separately do not show signs of similarities to the same extent as separated identical twins. Similarly, Pederson et al. (1988) stated that of 99 separated identical twins and 200 fraternal twins, in contrast to same numbers of non-separated identical and fraternal twins, separated twins had more dissimilar personalities. These results confirmed that identical twins reared apart appear to have more similar personalities than fraternal twins reared apart. Similarly, observational measures of shyness, activity, and aggressiveness show some shared environmental variation, whereas parent ratings of the same behaviours do not, but this was only the case during early childhood (Plomin, DeFries, 1994). Stein et al. (2002) observed the heritability of negative evaluation fears by using a twin sample (437 twin pairs aged between 18 and 86 years). Genetic correlations between twin scores on submissiveness, anxiousness and ocial avoidance aspects of a personality test were high. A study by Borkenau et al. (2002), testing 525 identical twins and 268 fraternal twins, reported that identical twins were more alike in their personalities than fraternal twins that were reared apart. These findings suggest the need for more observational research to assess the possible role of shared environment in personality develop ment. The challenge to personality researchers is to discover what non-shared experiences are relevant to personality change. There are, however, a number of recognised weaknesses within the method with adoption and twin studies. For instance, it is assumed that the adoptive children, their adoptive parents and their circumstances are mirroring the general population and, as a result, this flaw in the method of sampling leads to a bias which may cause researchers to underestimate or over estimate the genetic heritability across the whole population. Also, how can we be sure that people who adopt children are similar to those people who do not seek to adopt? Another problem with this method is the placement of the children themselves into an adoptive environment. Children who are placed with adoptive parents that are matched closely to their biological parents (as often happens) confuse matters further. Are the children behaving as they do because of their genes, sharing similar genetic makeup with their biological parents or because of environmental influences, as their adoptive parents are so similar to their biological parents. It would become difficult to answer this question. The wide range of concepts and theories of personality do state there to be stability from age to age, even in infancy, a period known to be of rapid developmental, (Costa McCrae, 1994). Not a lot is known, however, about the aspects that change in personality development. It is often assumed that stability is caused by genetic aspects and that environmental aspects are responsible for change. It would be incorrect to assume that the stability of personality is entirely associated with genetic aspects. It would be fair to state that stability can also be influenced by environmental factors, e. g. Freudians believed childhood experiences have a long term impact on personality. Conversely, it would be incorrect to assume the change in personality is entirely associated with environmental aspects. Genetic inheritance does not imply that there would be stability in personality this is due to the genes being dynamic in nature; altering in the amount and quality of their effects on the human as it, (Plomin, 1986). In recent studies of personality, it has been found that personality development throughout infancy is effected by both genetic and environmental change. An example of this can be seen in the MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study (MALTS). It showed the stability of personality in over 300 pairs of twins, across 14, 20, and 24 year old. The results indicated that at these ages genetic influence was a key factor in the development of personality, (Saudino et al. , 1996). Furthermore, researchers came to an agreement on genetic links across age, suggesting that there was a very little change from 14 to 24 months. During this stage there were huge changes in the non shared environmental influences. The results obtained doing such a study has consistent with longitudinal twin studies of adult personalities showing that non-shared environmental influences are highly linked with personality stability (Bacon,Lykken, 1993). The finding that personality change, is due to non-shared environmental influences is, perhaps, not surprising. Adoption studies see if identical twins who have been adopted by different families differ in their personalities. If the researchers found that, even though the identical twins are separate, their personalities are similar this would suggest a strong reason to believe that biology has a huge role to play as opposed to environment in personality. The opposite is also true, that if they do have different personalities it is due to the environment as opposed to it being genetically inherent. In recent studies of behavioural genetics came to an unusual conclusion stating that genetic aspects provide considerably to many widely used measures of environment (Plomin, 1994). When this is looked upon as a phenotype in genetic analyses, â€Å"environment issues†, such as life events and social support frequently show as much genetic influence as measures of personality (Plomin Bergeman, 1991). The finding indicate that even though the environment has no DNA is has a direct implication and has genetic effects. The answer to this problem is not as controversial or vague as it seems: Genetic influences on measures of the environment are the result of variation with genetically influenced characteristics of the individual. The next step, then, is to identify those genetically influenced characteristics that are responsible for genetic variance on environmental measures. Genetic study of environmental and personality measures propose that personality traits contribute to a portion of genetic effects on environmental measures during infancy and adulthood. An example of this can be seen in the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging (SATSA). The genetic effects on Neuroticism and Extraversion were reported to contribute largely to genetic effects on measures of the current family environment (Plomin Nesselroade, 1993). These ‘super factors’ show approximately 20% of the genetic variation on two Family Environment Scales of personality. Studies on personality and self reports of life events concluded that all genetic variation on life events that were controllable were widespread to personality (McClearn, Plomin, in press). Reporting’s on life events stated that there were no unique genetic variation on personality, indicating that for adults, genetic influences on life events are entirely affected by personality aspects. What are the mechanisms by which personality traits come to mediate genetic influence on environmental measures? The answer is dependent on the degree to which the environmental measure is accurate. Plomin, 1986). When the self-report method is used to measure environment, there is the possibility that the responses to the questionnaire are not true results based on experience; instead it reflects ones individuals view on the environment. These personal views are sorted through their genetically influenced personality which would cause genetic variation between personality and environmental measures. However, if the self-reports were accurate and the major genetic variation between personality and the environmental measure were found then this would imply genotype–environment link, i. . , individuals are exposed differently to environments as a function of their genetically influenced personality. Using objective measures of the environment genetic links between personality and environments are not just â€Å"in the eye of the beholder†. For instance, in the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP) genetic effects based on observation/interview measurements of two infants (aged 2) home environments were governed mainly by genetic effects on task orientation that were free of genetic effects shared with cognitive development (Saudino Plomin, in press). The results that followed showed that infants’ environments reflect parents’ responses to genetically influenced attentional type of the infants. This discovery is important, as results show that in some instances the environment reflects rather than affects characteristics of individuals, the assumption made by developmentalists has been the opposite; where links between environmental measures and developmental outcomes are caused environmentally, it can now be shown that this is not the case. Behavioural genetic research has contributed much more to the study of personality than heritability estimates. In the past decade researchers have begun to document the importance of environmental factors on personality traits, track the developmental course of genetic and environmental contributions to personality and evaluate the role that personality plays in the line between nature and nurture. Also the method in which one conducts the research must be altered to attain more tangible results, for example, in current research behavioural genetics has used the self-report personality questionnaire for adolescents and adults, and the use of parent reports for children.

Monday, November 25, 2019

easyjet essays

easyjet essays easyJet launched in 1995 as the UKs first no frills budget airline. Exploiting a 1987 European Commission rule change, allowing any airline with a valid Air Operators Certificate to operate on any route within the EU, Stelios Haji-Ioannou launched the airline with an initial 5million. He opened with a headline-grabbing fare of 29 from London Luton to Glasgow, basing easyJet on Southwest Airlines, a US company offering a no-frills, low-price service on short haul routes. easyJets mission statement concentrates on three main points which are carried through their business and marketing strategy: To provide our customers with safe, good value, point to point air services. To effect and to offer a consistent and reliable product and fares appealing to leisure and business markets on a range of European routes. To achieve this we will develop our people and establish lasting relationships with our suppliers. The importance of a good value service, a consistent and reliable service, and the establishment and maintenance of relationships are very important in the success story that is easyJet. By using an aggressive promotional strategy highlighting the quick, convenient service they provide, easyJet has increased passenger numbers, revenue and profits, year on year since their flotation on the stock market in 2000. Whilst gaining financial and market success, easyJet has also been successful in gaining plaudits from many recognised bodies; such as the Most significant impact on market sector, and the Most impressive brand developed in the last ten years awards at the Consumer Superbrands event. Brand stretching is often grouped with, or mistaken for, brand extension. Geoffrey Randall highlights the difference: Although the categories overlap, and the terms stretching and extension are often used interchangeably, we wi...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Solar Energy Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Solar Energy - Research Paper Example This means that there is no limit to the amount of solar energy that can be captures since the energy itself is renewable. The maintenance costs of solar power are also quite low compared to other forms of energy (Thomas 11). It is also quite easy to install solar panels which are available at relatively low costs. Solar energy can also be used in any setting, be it at home or an industrial setting. Another main pro of solar energy is its reliability. This is an energy source that will never be affected by geographical, economic or political upheavals (13). One of the major disadvantages of solar power is the fact that it is only available in places which have lots of sunshine. People who come from countries that are usually cold throughout cannot get as much solar energy as they would need for their daily use. Another disadvantage of solar energy is that it can only be captured during the day when there is enough sunlight. This means that one needs to have other forms of energy storage devices with which to store solar energy that has been captured during the day (Benduhn 34 and Thomas 22). Today, solar power is being used for many different purposes. It is used for domestic purposes that include heating, cooking, lighting, communications, operating spacecraft many others. People are turning to solar power as an alternative source of energy for use both at home and in industries. Solar panels are the most commonly used solar energy capturing equipment. In many cases, solar energy is being used as a source of backup energy in case of power failure. Healthcare facilities are embracing the use of solar energy in emergency situations. Production industries are also slowly opening up to the idea of using solar power for their everyday operations. The future does look brilliant for solar energy. More and more people are becoming aware of the effects that fossil fuels have on the environment and they are turning to the safe

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

DIURETICS DRUGS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

DIURETICS DRUGS - Essay Example Other classes of diuretics include the calcium-sparing diuretics, osmotic diuretics, low-ceiling diuretics among others. Just as vasodilators are, diuretics are also used to cure diseases such as diabetes and high blood pressure, among other respiratory diseases. These drugs aid the maintenance of the right blood pressure, and also increase the release of toxins from the body system. These diuretic drugs also improve the cardiac output and increase the pressure in the pulmonary capillaries. For diabetes patients, mostly, practitioners prefer to administer ultra-filtration therapy, claiming its effectiveness over diuretics. Before taking diuretic drugs, a patient ought to tell the doctor if he or she is taking other medications to avoid mixing drugs (diabetes and heart conditions) present a high risk in the event of drug contamination. Every diuretic drug comes with a medication guide that helps a patient to follow procedural treatment to hypertension or diabetes (Breidthardt et al, 2013). Diuretics therapy, for instance when administered to heart failure patients, has diverse functions that pose physiological effects to the body. The cardinal component in diuretic therapy provides a sodium balance in heart failure management. Other effects include improving dyspnea, general functioning of the cardiac system and also enhance exercise tolerance. Also, such diuretics reduce filling pressures in the cardiac system and also enhance decongestion in the pulmonary tubes (Blijderveen et al, 2014). This section relates to blood pressure (hypertension). Diuretics can either be administered as first generation or second subsequent generation. Studies indicate that when diuretics are given to hypertension patients as first generation medication, the outcome is outstanding and the patients experience significant reduction of pressure, hence reduced

Monday, November 18, 2019

Health Care Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Health Care Law - Coursework Example The coursework "Health Care Law" overviews the Legal â€Å"System of Health Care Statutory Laws† and presents the analysis which ‘law’ should be ‘modified’ or ‘repealed'. All states in the US regulate medical practitioners in their states, design social and health reforms in line with federal and its own laws, as well as ensuring patient privacy laws. In March 2010, US President signed a reformed Healthcare bill known as the Affordable Care Act, ACA, which aims to increase the number of people legible for medical insurance, particularly lower and middle-income earners. Although the new act will cost a lot, this will be spread over the next few years and it will be beneficial to all in the long run. The act, however, has caused mixed feelings among many people. Many of these would like to see some of the statutes in the bill repealed, especially if they are to pass the bill as law in their states. As many as 18 states have not yet fully voted for the bill to be law in their states. Many states are of the opinion that the act should take into consideration the milestones that individual states have taken in reforming state health care services. One of the biggest issues opposed by most of these states, including the state of Florida, is the requirement that every person is required to purchase health insurance by 2014, failure to which they will have harsh penalties imposed on them. Florida is one of the states that is opposing the Affordable Care Act, rather than seeking to repeal some rules in the act.

Saturday, November 16, 2019

English Romanticism And Its Characteristics

English Romanticism And Its Characteristics Romanticism as a trend in art and literature of England emerged in the 90th of XVIII century. Romanticism in England took shape earlier than in other Western European countries, it had its vivid specificity and individualism. Its most bright representatives were William Blake, William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Robert Southey, Thomas Moore, George Gordon Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Walter Scott, John Keats and others, who have left a rich heritage in the literature of England and contributed to the world literature. Romanticism is one of the most controversial trends in European literature, in the literature Romanticism is mostly understood not only as a formal literary trend, but as a certain philosophy, and it is through this philosophy that we try to define Romanticism. One of the features of Romanticism in England was its magnificent lyric poetry, especially lyric poetry, in which the identity of the poet was brightly expressed in whatever he wrote. English poets framed their observations and views in parables, fantastic visions, cosmic symbolism. Sublime things and feelings were understood by them not only as something exclusive, but that could be present in the simplest things, in everyday life. One of the characteristics of romantic literature was a special attention to the spiritual world of man, but, in contrast to the sentimental literature, Romantics were interested not in an ordinary man, but the exceptional man in the exceptional circumstances. Romantic hero is experiencing violent emotions, is striving for perfection, dreams of an ideal. Romantic hero loves and sometimes idealizes the Middle Ages time, pristine nature, in powerful forms of which he sees reflection of his strong and conflicting emotions. When characterizing the relation of romantic writers and poets to the world, it is important to point aspiration to the ideal, human impulses and feelings, the belief that not logic and knowledge but intuition and imagination could reveal all the mysteries of life. But it is aspiration to the ideal, sometimes illusory or unattainable, that lead to rejection of everyday life which did not meet that ideal. Therefore, the romantic heroes had an internal duality, forced to live in two disparate worlds of the ideal and reality, sometimes coming in protest not only against the bone of reality, but also against the divine world order. Here came the so-called romantic irony of a man in relation to an established reality, that the average man took seriously. In general, the idea is often combined with irony, that is the peculiarity of English literature at all stages of its development. English Romantics were especially interested in social problems, as to the modern bourgeois society they opposed the old, pre-bourgeois relations, they glorified nature and simple, natural feelings. Bright representative of English Romanticism is Byron, who, according to critics, clothed in a dull hopeless romanticism and selfishness. His works are full of pathos of struggle and protest against the modern world, glorifying freedom and individualism. Understanding of nature and its image in the works of the Romantics In the late XVIII early XIX century the very understanding of nature has changed. First of all, it was associated with changes in life philosophy and world view of romantics, who then explained all the phenomena from another point of view, different from the medieval and enlightenment views. The change in the philosophy of the world spirit and in understanding of nature had effects on the romantic image of the landscape: Romantics view the world spirit as a basic principle of nature, as weak, vacillating, the least comprehensible and most mysterious part of nature. With this understanding of nature, the image of nature and landscape appeared as dual: the nature itself and also the spirit that filled it and governed it. Some critics argue that the difference of the romantic interpretation of the nature was in the fact that romanticism tried to carry balance of the world of pure ideas with the world of tangible and visible things, eliminating their opposition. (Abrams, 1975) These questions are very important, because the nature of romantic poetry has saved not only the aesthetic value of artistic expression of its philosophy, but also it reflected a truly profound ideas and experiences, great human emotions. It is important to stress the fact that according to Romantics, nature in general and all its parts have specific features of the human soul. Though it is important to say that such personalization and conception of nature as subordinate to the world spirit is very important peculiarity of romantic literature, because it reflects the problem of mans relationship to the world. Thus, the very meaning of nature in the XVIII and XIX centuries was entirely different. What is the something else, something new that distinguishes a romantic view of nature from its premises? Scientific literature emphasizes such characteristics of views and attitudes towards nature in romantic works: the deep romanticism subjectivity, the subjectivity of nature, precise, individual attitude to the subjects of nature; projection of mood of the writer on nature and vice versa; the identification of the sensitive subject with nature; the animation of nature by subjective emotions of the poet; passionate relationship of man to nature. (Moore J, 2010) Subjectivity of nature is a broader concept than the organic view of Romantics on nature, as this concept unites a wide range of romantic poets. In English and in German literature subjectivity of nature is expressed more explicitly than other literatures. Example of words of Byron, who very often expressed his love to nature, points to the fact that the subjective relationship with nature is very important feature of Romanticism. There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more. (Byron G.G., Childe Harolds Pilgrimage) The main aspect in the romantic view on the nature is its subjectivity, the corresponding correlation of the poets mood with the natural world. It is a subjective interpretation of nature that is widely used by Romantic poets, and such features as variety of moral epithets, passion, and association of objects with personal these are the most obvious examples of this poetic temperament. Nature knows, loves, suffers and dreams, like a man, and together with the man. (Moore, 2010) Thus, the Romanticism is characterized by a sense of unity between man and nature, but this is not always expressed in the pantheistic forms, and may be associated with different ideological positions. Moreover, this unity can act in the forms of dualistic split, when nature embodies peace and harmony, and is opposed to sufferings and disharmony of human relationship. Passionate experience of relationship between the hero and nature is inherent to all romantics, though it may be shown differently by different romantic poets. On the one hand, in their writings dominate the image of landscape, which reflects their search for beauty, for picturesque images. On the other, they pay more attention to the state of the human soul and his feelings, and so the image of nature is a projection of the state of the soul, and the poet turns from the descriptions of nature to description of feelings, mixing them and showing relationship between them. Thus, the declaration of the relationship of natu re with the inner world of man is an important practice in works of romantic poets. (Perkins, 1994) It is the hour when from the boughs The nightingales high note is heard; It is the hour when lovers vows Seem sweet in every whispered word; And gentle winds, and waters near, Make music to the lonely ear. Each flower the dews have lightly wet, And in the sky the stars are met, And on the wave is deeper blue, And on the leaf a browner hue, And in the heaven that clear obscure, So softly dark, and darkly pure. Which follows the decline of day, As twilight melts beneath the moon away. (Byron G., Parisina (st. 1) It is important to note that for romantic poets nature was an expression of spiritual life, where they saw the mirror reflection of either their own soul, or the ideal life that constituted the object of their dreams. Therefore, in their works nature is endowed with more deep meaning, than the meaning of words. Animation, humanization of nature in perception, imagination was one of the favorite motifs of poets. In contrast to the dead to society, which kills a living soul in the pursuit of profit, career, power, the nature comes to life, filled with the spiritual life of people. In this case they usually have in mind the wild nature, untouched by man, which gives rest, forgetfulness and peace. Sometimes the opposition of society and nature took the form of an antithesis of town and country, and then under the nature was meant idyllic countryside, dramatically different from a nervous and noisy city. In contrast to the false and empty society, in nature everything is simple, genuine and harmonious. An example of the poetic chanting of nature were the works of lyrical poet John Keats, who wrote on the high themes of love, beauty and art art. In his poem Autumn (1820) Keats went completely from the mythological imagery, creating a picture of autumn the time of a sad farewell to the past before the harsh winter. Landscape in the poem is associated with the image of a simple man a peasant who lives in a perpetual work. Season of mists and mellow fruitfulness, Close bosom-friend of the maturing sun; Conspiring with him how to load and bless With fruit the vines that round the thatch-eves run; To bend with apples the mossd cottage-trees, And fill all fruit with ripeness to the coreà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ (Keats J. To Autumn, in The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 2005) The contradiction between the dream and the reality the romantic poet Keats expressed as a contradiction between the desired ideal of beauty and bourgeois prose. Keatss admiration for the beauty was not, however, fled from life, from the problems of reality. In his poetry, he showed the truth of life, the essence of reality, he poeticized the beauty that was hidden in life under the cover of some ugly things. But when the melancholy fit shall fall Sudden from heaven like a weeping cloud, That fosters the droop-headed flowers all, And hides the green hill in an April shroud; Then glut thy sorrow on a morning rose, Or on the rainbow of the salt sand-wave, Or on the wealth of globà ¨d peonies; Or if thy mistress some rich anger shows, Emprison her soft hand, and let her rave, And feed deep, deep upon her peerless eyes. (Keats J. , Ode on Melancholy, The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 2005 ) Another prominent representative of Romantic literature in England was Lord George Gordon Byron. Byron was committed to the educational ideals and aesthetics of classicism, but he was a romantic poet. In his work the recognition of the classic rigor and clarity was combined with the image of the complex and ambiguous feelings, painted in a gloomy mood, but also with irony. The moon is up, and yet it is not night; Sunset divides the sky with her; a sea Of glory streams along the Alpine height Of blue Friulis mountains; Heaven is free From clouds, but of all colours seems to be. (Byron G. Childe Harolds Pilgrimage, A Romaunt, Canto IV, XXVII) In the romantic poems we see the strong desire to image bright and sharp contrasts , also in the image of nature. Romantics often sought to portray a violent nature, and Byron seemed liked the the presence of danger, a storm for him was a symbol of the great, though often fatal passions. Roll on, thou deep and dark blue ocean-roll! Ten thousand fleets sweep over thee in vain; Man marks the earth with ruin-his control Stops with the shore;-upon the watery plain The wrecks are all thy deed, nor doth remainà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ (Byron G. Childe Harolds Pilgrimage, Canto II, CLXXIX) Aspiration to an ideal and admiration of the perfect beauty of the nature can be found in the beautiful poems of Percy Shelley. The character of pictures of nature by Shelley organically derives from his philosophical views, based on the knowledge of the history of philosophy from ancient times, from truly encyclopedic knowledge. Shelley sometimes animates the nature, gives it consciousness and characteristics of highest creation he signs a hymn to the Spirit of Nature, by declaring the entire Universe as its temple. The influence of the materialist: it were ideas of Enlightenment and the Renaissance that played a decisive role in the evolution of philosophical views of Shelley. In Ode to the West Wind (1819) the symbolic image of the West Wind is the idea of renewal of life: the west wind destroys everything old in its path and helps to create new. The lyrical hero-champion is one with the mighty power of the West Wind. O wild West Wind, thou breath of Autumns being, Thou, from whose unseen presence the leaves dead Are driven, like ghosts from an enchanter fleeing, Yellow, and black, and pale, and hectic redà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Wild Spirit, which art moving everywhere; Destroyer and Preserver; hear, O hear! (Shelley P.B., Ode To The West Wind, I) Shelley shows the magic power of the wind magically, describing its role as destroyer and preserver, by powerful natural metaphors the poet expresses his ideas about the power and great effect of the nature. Thus, we can see that the Romantic poets often showed the nature as free, powerful and beautiful world that is different from the human. Especially romantic poets liked to portray the sea in this sense, its boundless scope and majestic power, the wind, which has unlimited power and freedom, and the mountains with their grandeur and sublime beauty. In this case, the freedom and the power of natural elements have a figurative meaning, associated with free and powerful human spirit. Conclusion Romanticism is characterized by a sense of unity between man and nature. Consequently, the most importantly in the romantic views of nature is subjectivity, the corresponding correlation of the poets mood with the natural world. The romantic perception of nature is not just individual attitude of the subject to the outside world, but the nature helps to express the attitude of individual to the social conditions of his existence. In the perception and evaluation of the nature is expressed the relationship of the individual to the public life, to the meaning of human existence.

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

perspective :: essays research papers

Perspective I understand perspective as being your own understanding as well as your own interpretation of anything you read or witness. It is also your own insight and beliefs on the hidden nature of things. Perspective is the way you and only you analyze a situation. It can be shared with other’s who share your same perspective, as well as being shared with other’s who have their own insight which will be a total opposite of yours. In 1965 Malcolm X had made a statement â€Å"you have to be careful, very careful, introducing the truth to the Black man who has never previously heard the truth about himself, his own kind, and the white man†¦ The Black brother is so brainwashed that he may even be repelled when he first hears the truth†. Reading Malcolm X’s statement as well as absorbing many of the material I’ve accumulated in class I strongly believe having a perspective is important, but having your own perspective is even more important. When having your own beliefs you won’t be so gullible, as well as easily fooled on what’s being done to you or around you, You’ll have a clear insight and won’t be taken advantage of. Having your own outlook, you could make changes that are more helpful to you and others, rather than harming you and what’s around you. In the past, when the Negroes were uneducated and didn’t know any better they had no perspective and were easily fooled thinking everything was the way it was supposed to be. For instance the white man took the Africans and had them believing in the Christianity religion. This was brainwashing the Africans to believe god has made them inferior to the white man. By having no perspective of there own they believe d this perspective and remained a slave, thinking they was doing the right thing. Now having a clear thought, we don’t let harmful things get passed us without attempting to make correction for the better. For example when the racism was a huge issue, and we were severely mistreated by many whites as well as the Police Department in the late 60’s and 70’s, an organization by the name of the Black Panther Party was formed. They had fought for our rights as well as our right to be treated equal to others. Having a perspective we are now able to serve and make beneficial changes for others as well as ourselves. perspective :: essays research papers Perspective I understand perspective as being your own understanding as well as your own interpretation of anything you read or witness. It is also your own insight and beliefs on the hidden nature of things. Perspective is the way you and only you analyze a situation. It can be shared with other’s who share your same perspective, as well as being shared with other’s who have their own insight which will be a total opposite of yours. In 1965 Malcolm X had made a statement â€Å"you have to be careful, very careful, introducing the truth to the Black man who has never previously heard the truth about himself, his own kind, and the white man†¦ The Black brother is so brainwashed that he may even be repelled when he first hears the truth†. Reading Malcolm X’s statement as well as absorbing many of the material I’ve accumulated in class I strongly believe having a perspective is important, but having your own perspective is even more important. When having your own beliefs you won’t be so gullible, as well as easily fooled on what’s being done to you or around you, You’ll have a clear insight and won’t be taken advantage of. Having your own outlook, you could make changes that are more helpful to you and others, rather than harming you and what’s around you. In the past, when the Negroes were uneducated and didn’t know any better they had no perspective and were easily fooled thinking everything was the way it was supposed to be. For instance the white man took the Africans and had them believing in the Christianity religion. This was brainwashing the Africans to believe god has made them inferior to the white man. By having no perspective of there own they believe d this perspective and remained a slave, thinking they was doing the right thing. Now having a clear thought, we don’t let harmful things get passed us without attempting to make correction for the better. For example when the racism was a huge issue, and we were severely mistreated by many whites as well as the Police Department in the late 60’s and 70’s, an organization by the name of the Black Panther Party was formed. They had fought for our rights as well as our right to be treated equal to others. Having a perspective we are now able to serve and make beneficial changes for others as well as ourselves.